TPM Reader JO, on the U.S. Attorney purges:(Emphasis added.)
A lot of people seem to be getting snowed by the dodge that some of the acting US Attorneys will go through the confirmation process as if it gets rid of the problem, but it really doesn't.
Before they changed the statute, the President had no effective way to put a political stooge in as US Attorney for more than 4 months without buy-in from another branch of government (or a year at most via a recess appointment). But now he can, and putting the stooge up for confirmation is a no-lose proposition. If the Senate confirms, great. If they never give the nominee a hearing, they only prolong his tenure. And if they reject the nominee, he can still stay in office until a new nominee is appointed -- which might never happen.
This is a serious blow to effective law-enforcement, and it's going to make morale plummet in prosecutors' offices all over the country.
Has anyone introduced legislation yet to strip this misguided provision from the Patriot Act?
Update: The answer is yes. Senators Feinstein, Leahy, and Pryor have introduced the Preserving United States Attorney Independence Act, which would restore to the District Courts the power to appoint interim U.S. Attorneys.
Well, this obscenity is still the law....
No comments:
Post a Comment